Friday, February 13, 2015

HEALTH CARE WE CAN AFFORD

In the US, the share of GDP devoted to healthcare spending grew from 9 percent of GDP in 1980 to 16 percent of GDP in 2008.

The level of health care cost growth cannot be sustained, so in order to dramaticaly reduce the cost of health care, the following needs to be done so that

 the last twenty years of your life when health care costs is the most, it does not result in bankrupting you:

As insurance against the last years of a person's life, which is the most costly, the person would be taxed according to his income level and in return he gets a biometric health ID card for the following services:

 (1) The biometric card reader on the bus enables him to get free transportation to the nearest community health center where there is a free gym and free gym classes.

 (2) If he provides his own transportation to the community health center, he gets reimbursed by the government on his taxes the next year.

 (3) At the community health center, he passes certain annual medical tests and gets a reimbursement check ( of taxes paid ) for being healthy .

 (4) His health ID card entitles him to get a weekly allotment of wild caught salmon, organic fruits and vegetables at the community health center.

 (5) His health ID card also entitles him to preventive dental services at the community health center.

 (6) A patient who is sick goes to the nearest community health center and gets an official diagnosis of his problem from three different independent doctors at the community health center.

 The doctors use a sophisticated computer program that analyses every possible symptom suffered by the patient.

 The official diagnosis is automatically sent online to a central government processing center.

 (7) An online auction system ( available to the public to see ) of every known procedure that tells doctors what a reasonable price is ( according to a panel of experts in that procedure )

 enables doctors to bid against each other in order to get as close as possible to the reasonable price.

 Doctors do not have to bid and can just accept the reasonable price posted on the website.

 (8) The central government processing center automatically matches the official diagnosis of the patient with a list of  doctors (nearest to the patient) who have successfully bid on that particular procedure on the government auction online.

 (9) The patient is sent online or by mail, the address of several doctors nearby who have successfully bid for that particular procedure and who are ranked according to peer reviewed criteria in (12) below and the patient makes an appointment with the doctor whom he thinks has the best peer reviewed grading according to (12) below.

 (10) After buying all medications at a huge discount, the government dispenses the free medication (according to the doctor's prescription) through the community health center's onsite pharmacy.

 (11) Every community health center will have free drug rehabilitation and mental health facilities for those who have become dependent on drugs of any kind (prescription and non-prescription )  because people on drugs have been known to commit violent crime and be involved in car crashes where your loved ones are at risk.

(12) After treatment feedback, a hospital's health environment grade in preventing hospital acquired infections and repeated corrective procedures by a doctor indicating incompetency or greed can all be seen by the public online in one government sponsored website that grades hospitals and doctors according to peer reviewed criteria.

In closing:

 If people feel they are being taxed upfront for free gym services and free food plus reimbursement checks for being healthy, they will have enough incentives to get those free services since

 they paid for them upfront and for those who don't care about the free food, free gym services and reimbursement checks, that is ok because
 
even if a tiny minority lead healthy lifestyles due to being taxed and getting part of that tax back (for leading healthy lifestyles), its going to make a major difference in reducing overall health care costs.

Saturday, December 20, 2014

Was Travis Alexander's death premeditated ?

IF YOU ARE CHECKING FOR YOUR MONTHLY UPDATES HERE AND YOU ARE TOLD THIS POSTING DOES NOT EXIST, IT MEANS NEW INFORMATION IS BEING ADDED AND NOT READY FOR PUBLICATION, SO KEEP CHECKING BACK DAILY AND THE POSTING SHOULD BE UP, ON ONE OF YOUR TRIES.


The information below has been compiled by various contributors from various sources, both inside and outside of jail, in order to give a complete picture of the Jodi Arias case and for those who want to submit this blog address to Jodi in order to help her with her appeal, please send a metered postcard ( not stamped ) in black ink to :

Jodi Arias #281129
ASPC-Perryville
Unit-Lumley
PO Box 3300
Goodyear AZ85395

The  posting below will be updated on a regular basis, so check back at least once a month for the latest information added to it, thanks.


Whenever new information is added to the post, we will update the time below and since we cannot separate new information from what was already previously posted, please  read the entire post again because

 the new information is sometimes spread out throughout the post.


NEW INFORMATION HAS BEEN ADDED TO THE FOLLOWING POSTING AS OF:

7:56 PM (CST) ON 4/26/15.



The following will answer three questions :

  (A) Was it premeditated ?
  (B) Was it self-defense ?
  (C) What actually happened ?

Language used in court is very important in a capital murder case and throughout this trial, language used by the judge was biased against Jodi.

We believe that Jodi has a good case for an appeal because early on in the trial and before the jury was given the opportunity to deliberate the case,  the jury was biased against Jodi when the judge clearly stated that Travis was the victim, meaning that in a capital murder case, if the deceased is the victim, it automatically makes the jury think ( thanks to the judge) that the defendant is the victimizer or is guilty of capital murder and this bias against Jodi was propagated by both the judge and the prosecutor before the jury could deliberate the case.

Even the word "murdered" was used several times in court before the jury could deliberate the case.

What if the defense team started referring to Jodi as the survivor, would the judge and prosecutor have approved ? off course not.


Before we get to the questions, all of Jodi's lies can be summed up in one sentence : Jodi's lies (at the beginning ) come from her sincere desire to not hurt Travis' reputation or Travis' family with the truth of what actually happened which would also subject her to more emotional abuse from the media and Travis' friends/family plus the fact that

Jodi feels enormous guilt in instigating Travis on the day of his death (details in Section C below ).

This desire to protect Travis' reputation and Travis' family  can be seen at the 2:50 timeline in the video below





It took Jodi years to tell the truth or at least most of the truth regarding Travis because of Jodi's acute desire to protect Travis' reputation and ego.


Also, before we answer the first question, you would think heroic acts done on behalf of the US government  would be remembered but even when the  killing is done at half a mile away from the target,  US  snipers don't remember the actual killing.

You would think that killing at such a great distance will be remembered but here

here is one example of not being able to remember the killing,  at the 19:42 timeline in the video below :




In the above video, our American hero cant remember the following, calling it a " defense mechanism " :

(1) He forgot everything surrounding the "heroic mission" of killing on behalf of the US government

(2) He even forgets where he has been when the "heroic mission" of killing happened on behalf of the US government

(3) He even forgets the people he met during his "heroic mission" of killing on behalf of the US government.


In light of the above phenomenon, it is our opinion that Jodi Arias was guessing at what happened on the day Travis died, so keep that in mind when reading the entire post.

Jodi's "fog" story could not have been made up because

 if she wanted to tell a "selective fog story" to benefit her, she  could have easily said that Travis had the gun or knife but she not once said that Travis had the gun or knife because she could not remember much of anything about the events surrounding the death of Travis (details in Section C below ).



The more we research this case, the more we see what Travis truly was, a sweet guy to many people but

 to people whom Travis considered as weak or a nobody, he held grudges even for the slightest provocation and  he let his unpredictable temper loose (details below ) which shows that Travis himself was abused as a child.

While Jodi's childhood abuse made her cling to those she was in love with, Travis' childhood abuse made him into a sexual deviant ( details below ) and emotionally abusive to those he saw as weak or clingy.

Its laughable that the Prosecutor did not want the jury to see a picture of Jodi with her dog because he said the picture was highly prejudicial in favor of Jodi when at the same time,

 highly prejudicial language was allowed in court, referring to Travis as the "victim" and even the word "murdered" was used, while Jodi by implication and even directly was referred to as the "assailant", "killer" and "attacker".

How would the prosecutor like it if the defense team kept referring to Jodi as the survivor ?


Now, to the questions:



(A) Was it premeditated ?

There are  many points that do not indicate premeditation.

We could not find a premeditation case in which a girl ( the defendant ) used a knife against a much stronger man when a gun was available, so the fact a knife was used indicates a fight for survival on the girl's part and

 if a gun was initially used and the gun jammed, logic would dictate that the girl (the defendant) would flee instead of trying to kill a much stronger man with a knife unless her life was in danger.

Also, we could not find even one premeditation case in which the suspect spent over 15 hours visiting with the "victim", with neighbors and renters around, having intimate moments and even a photo session which ended with the camera being kicked around by accident.

In premeditation cases, time is of the essence and every minute that passes by in the presence of the "victim", exposes the suspect  ( in a covert mission ) to being discovered.

 If we assume Jodi turned off the phone in order to be covert in Arizona, why did she risk staying in Arizona for more than 15 hours when every minute that passes by during the daytime hours would risk her  or her upside down licence plate being exposed to either police,  roommates or neighbors or strangers seeing her or her upside down license plated car outside in broad daylight.


For a person who took all the trouble to be covert in entering Arizona, isn't it surprising that she  suddenly decides to spend over 15 long hours with the "victim" without gloves,  knowing that every minute that passes by especially during the day time stood a very good chance of her fingerprints being all over the place, the police discovering her car ( in the driveway or on the street) with an upside down license plate plus blowing her cover with neighbors and renters around ?

The upside down license plate only makes sense if Jodi decided to lure Travis quickly into the bedroom, kill him, put on the ski mask and gloves she brought along, lock the bedroom door and

 make a quick getaway before 4 or 5 AM in the morning when the chances of being seen by neighbors or renters are at a minimum but because

 she decided to spend over 15 hours with Travis shows she changed her mind about killing him and forgot about the upside down license plate of her car parked in the driveway or on the street.


Another indication that Jodi changed her mind ( about killing Travis ) was when Jodi  called Ryan Burns (her alibi )  from southern California around 9:00 PM on Tuesday. (June 3rd)

She was supposed to get to Ryan's house --  a 12-hour drive from LA to Salt Lake City.

 She was going to get to Ryan's house at 9:00 AM if she did not stop to rest.

. So if she went through the plan of killing Travis in the early Wednesday morning hours (3 or 4AM) on June 4th,

, Jodi could still have made it to her Salt Lake City alibi when Ryan Burns was expecting her at. 12:00 or 1:00 PM but 

because Jodi changed her mind about killing Travis,  she was at Travis' house at 1PM and she blew her alibi of being at Ryan's house at 1PM because she changed her mind.

An alibi only works if the planned killing is done quickly and police cannot determine at what time the killing took place while the suspect can point to her alibi as evidence that she was not there at the time the death happened.

In other words, premeditation cannot be proven after she decided to spend over 15 hours with Travis, blowing her alibi with Ryan.



In past premeditation cases, if the suspect knew the victim well but did not live with the victim, the suspect always wore gloves and committed the killing within minutes of either breaking into the victim's house or entering the victim's house and the killing always takes place when the possibility of being seen is at a minimum, in other words, the killing takes place when potential witnesses (renters, neighbors etc ) are sleeping.

Also, without any prompting or leading from the interrogation detective, Jodi herself said that she had plenty of gloves and would have used them if premeditation was on her mind.


The prosecution made a reasonable assumption that the gun was stolen by Jodi but at the same time, the prosecution did not make a reasonable assumption that gloves were also taken by Jodi which means if gloves were not worn at the scene, she must have taken them off before getting to Travis' house or

Jodi could have changed her mind  in Travis' office when Travis must have asked her why she was wearing gloves and that is when she changed her mind due to Travis showing his "good side".


During the covert mission  and before she changed her mind, we have a strong case that Jodi took both a knife and gun because she knew the gun was not reliable (details in section C below ) and if the gun did not work, an enraged Travis would have gone after her and she knew she needed the knife to defend against Travis if flight was not possible.

Intention to kill cannot be proved, especially after the time Travis greeted Jodi in his office on June 4th and Travis probably asked her why she was wearing gloves and once she removed her gloves, after that, there are mitigating factors that do not prove intent to kill.


Detectives knew that any kind of premeditation would have involved gloves but the fact that Jodi spent hours at Travis' house putting her finger prints all over the place made the detectives want to interview Jodi for hours to find out what happened if the killing was not premeditated.

The following interrogation videos will show that the interrogation detectives only had one side of the story, Travis and his family/friends' side of the story including all the forensic evidence that made a jury indict Jodi,

 so there was no reason for hours of interrogation if the detectives firmly believed in  premeditated murder when

 the detectives clearly knew that defendants seldom confess to premeditation.

In the link below, it shows Detective Flores' doubt about premeditated murder at the 5:06 timeline when

 Detective Flores clearly says he does not know whether it was premeditated or not:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5lGJ72SQBM

Detective Flores states that in all his experience as a detective, he does not see Jodi as a cold blooded killer ( watch at the 5:37 timeline in the link below ):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5lGJ72SQBM

The second interrogation detective concurs with Detective Flores when she clearly states at the 7:56 timeline (in the link below) that she does not believe the killing was premeditated:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMNd_-FGftM


At the 28:12 timeline in the link below, the detective asked Jodi whether Travis contributed to events that went out of control :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSv2ohtbDWQ

At the 1:05 timeline in the link below, the detective asks Jodi was scared of Travis on the day Travis died, again doubting  premeditation:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKlVZHazSqI

The detective again doubting premeditation, asks Jodi whether she feared Travis on the day Travis died ( Watch at the 3:40 timeline in the link below ):
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NKlVZHazSqI




You can clearly see by the above line of questioning in the videos above, both detectives were trying their best to make Jodi confess to the lesser charge of manslaughter and not premeditated murder because

 the detectives themselves, after looking at all the physical evidence and the stories from Travis friends and family, still could not believe it was premeditated.



From all the evidence we got to see,  the killing was planned until Jodi arrived at Travis' house or before Jodi arrived at Travis' house when she thought about Travis' "good side" which  made her change her mind about killing Travis and

that is the reason she took off the  gloves that she was wearing before she opened the front door which makes premeditation after that point hard to prove because

 why would Jodi leave her finger prints all over the place if she wanted to actually carry out a covert murder.


As for Jodi changing her mind due to Travis "good side", read the closing statements at the end regarding  Travis' psychopathy and multiple personalities ( some which were good ).


Even when threatened by Travis (details in section C below ) Jodi was not able to pull the trigger and that hesitation resulted in a struggle and a messy killing (with the camera being kicked around).


We know the Travis attempted to use people for sex (even though he was unsuccessful with the Mormon girls and afraid for his reputation as a virginal Mormon).

One of the Mormon girls said that she felt used by Travis ( even though she never had sex with him ). Watch at the 31:19 timeline in the link below :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SO0YdawUss0&index=17&list=PL71F4FE185A0B69EB


  Being mentally tormented and feeling used and abused,

 Jodi's  plan was to wear gloves before touching the front door knob,  kill Travis quickly and leave in the early morning hours so that his roommates or neighbors would not see her leaving the house but

because she  thought about  Travis' "good side" which showed through the calls made prior to her arrival,

 she  took off her gloves before she opened the front door knowing her finger prints will be all over the place but she did not mind her finger prints all over the place  because she gave up on her plan to kill him.

After having changed her mind about killing Travis,

she ended up spending hours at Travis' house, knowing his roommates were around, her fingerprints were all over the place after having taken off the gloves and Jodi knew

  anybody, including the neighbors, could see her leaving the house during the daytime.


While not thinking straight about her finger prints being all over the place, she attempted  to kill Travis while Travis slept.

After making sure his roommates were fast asleep,  Jodi tried to kill Travis while he was sleeping but she could not bring herself to pulling the trigger.


Jodi suggested that she use Travis' camera for the afternoon shower photo session.

 If the killing was planned, she could have easily told him that she will use her camera for the photo session, so that she can take the camera with her after the killing and delete the photos later ( at leisure ) after the killing but

 the fact that Travis' camera was used shows that the killing was not planned because using Travis' camera would involve getting rid of the evidence somehow and that takes time and in a planned killing, time is of the essence.


Finally,

 the crime scene does not point to premeditation since we know that Jodi was a photographer and

 she could have easily put the camera away safely before committing the killing but

  the fact that the camera was shooting accidental photos shows a sudden turn of events and not to premeditation.

The camera in the washer is another indication it was not premeditated all the way.

Everybody knew that Jodi was always around cameras, so why such a obvious clue by leaving the camera in the washer which shows panic and not premeditation.


The prosecutor wants you to think that Jodi was so careful in not wanting anybody to know that she was in Arizona and yet after the killing, the Prosecutor fails to reveal why Jodi did not take her time to clean up the scene, put the camera in the bag along with the bloody knife and gun but the evidence shows that Jodi never expected a sudden turn of events ( details in Section C below ) so Jodi's behavior after the killing is a sign of panic and not planning.





(B) Was it in self-defense ?

To answer that question, we have to ask whether Travis posed a danger to Jodi on the day Travis died.

First, a little bit of Travis' character before his death.

Mimi Hall recalls Travis being persistent at the 1;51;20 timeline in the link below :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Fn7WHx4TCw&index=5&list=PL71F4FE185A0B69EB


Even when a girlfriend of Travis asked him not to "grab her butt", Travis persisted. Watch at the 31:40 timeline in the video below :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SO0YdawUss0&index=17&list=PL71F4FE185A0B69EB



Could this persistency on Travis part be the cause of Travis saying Jodi was stalking, in other words,

Travis is persistent,

 Jodi responds to Travis' persistency in a positive way and then

Travis spreads rumors that Jodi is stalking him in order to maintain his reputation as a virginal Mormon who is not obsessed with sex, sexual fantasies of minors (details below ) and having sex with Jodi.


We know that Travis had peculiar interests in sex, for example, while Jodi would not take close up views of Travis' genitals, Travis had the proclivity to take extremely close up views of Jodi's genitals.




One of Travis' friends was Sky Hughes.

Sky Hughes accuses Travis of being a "heart predator and  stringing Jodi along".

 Sky Hughes tells Travis:  " you (Travis ) get great joy in making women fall for the T-dogg and you (Travis) laugh about what you can get away with"(end of quote). 


Sky Hughes was so detested by Travis' behavior that she said she will never let her sister date Travis because apparently Sky Hughes saw the psychopath in Travis when even Travis admitted at one time,

   in an email to the Hughes, Travis stated : “I am a bit of a sociopath.” ( end of quote ).

Travis enjoyed and got excited by seeing people being bruised and battered and he celebrated violence by having celebratory UFC parties at his house.

We know that not all sociopaths or psychopaths are criminals but those who are criminals have psychopathic tendencies.


In the months leading up to Travis' death,

we know from the evidence presented in court that Travis had the following psychopathic and non-psychopathic characteristics that eventually pushed him over the edge on the day  of his death,


(1) Travis was under a lot of stress, possibly financial stress (details below ) and people under stress can snap at anytime.

(2) Travis hatred towards Jodi was growing to the point he wished her dead (details below) even calling for her heart to stop beating since she , according to Travis, was a "corrupted carcass".

(3) Travis seems to imply that Jodi was blackmailing him, even though there is no evidence of regular money deposits into Jodi's bank account to buy her silence ( details below ).

(4) Travis had the rape of Jodi on his mind and even statutory rape of little girls was part of Travis' fantasies and in Travis' own words heard in court, Travis admitted his statutory rape fantasies of little girls when Travis said   "corking the pot of a little girl" ,  which shows

 Travis had fantasies of violence or even the rape of a minor child.


(5) Travis wanted to use a gun (details below).

(6) Travis dehumanized Jodi to the point that it was so much easier to kill her since killers usually dehumanize a person to the point where killing becomes easy.


(7) Travis had a shocking temper which ( in our opinion ) could lead to violence (details below).


(8) Between Jodi and Travis,  Travis was the aggressor when he used violent language like "beating up" a person, "blasting" people and  "shredding people to pieces" (in a telephone conversation with Jodi.)

(9) In Travis' mind, he was an aging Mormon and so Travis had a sense of urgency  with regards to marrying a  virginal Mormon girl and he knew that

Jodi was the only one who could sabotage his plans of a happy marriage if the truth of his sexual deviancy came to light (since Jodi had the audio evidence of his deviancy).


(10) Rejection by a  potential virginal Mormon wife  devastated Travis and Travis probably blamed Jodi (in our opinion) for the rejection (details below ).

(11) Travis warned Jodi that she was going to feel his wrath and that he was planning his revenge (details below).




To elaborate on the above points:


(1) What points to financial stress that Travis felt increasingly before his death that could have made him snap at Jodi.

In the months before Travis' death, he was draining Jodi's bank account which shows he either had money problems causing him stress or

 Travis was using Jodi for both money and sex.

Jodi writes in her journal on 1/24/08:

  " I wanted to soothe away his (Travis) worries. He was under more stress than I had ever seen him. He was really despairing today. I lended him another $80 " (end of quote).

 Jodi's journal entry of 1/24/08:

  " I drained my checking account to put money into his (Travis) and then was hit with tons of fees, fees that he isn't going to pay, $96 worth " (end of quote).



(2) Travis hatred towards Jodi was growing to the point he wished her dead (another motive to kill ).

Travis' message to Jodi on 5/26/08:

"you (Jodi) have betrayed me worse than any example I could conjour, you are sick and you have scamed me " (end of quote).
.
 Jodi attributes Travis' mean words above ( that do not make sense) to his state of mind that involved his sexual attraction to 12 year old girls and Travis felt that Jodi was betraying him somehow for bringing it up. plus the fact that

 Jodi had a audio recording of  Travis' fantasies regarding statutory rape of minors.


Travis told Jodi that she did not deserve to live when Travis said the following :  "  (Jodi) You're taking up people's air." (end of quote) and

 wanting Jodi's heart to stop beating because according to Travis, Jodi was a "corrupted carcass".


Psychopaths often refer to people as not deserving to live.


(3) Travis used the words "you (Jodi) have scamed me" (end of quote ).

Did Travis imply that Jodi had the potential of  blackmailing him ? with the audio evidence of fantasies regarding the rape of a child.

Here again is another motive to kill, in our opinion.


(4) According to audio recordings heard in Court, we know that Travis had rape and even statutory rape of minor girls on his mind which shows that he was capable of violence ( in our opinion )

because no normal person thinks about rape unless that person is a sadist or psychopath.


(5) Jodi's journal entry of 1/24/08:

  " .... he wants to get a gun and put it to his head and pull the trigger." (end of quote).

According to Jodi's journal entry above, it is Travis who was willing to use a gun and a suicidal person is just as likely to use the gun on himself as he is on another person, especially when

 he already told Jodi that she did not deserve to live when Travis said the following :  "  (Jodi) You're taking up people's air." (end of quote).


(6) Dehumanizing another human  being is a technique used by psychopaths because its a lot easier to kill another person whom the psychopath considers as less than human and here are some of the dehumanizing words Travis said to Jodi :

 whore,

 rotten,

 evil,

 satan,

 three hole wonder,

 slut,

 you're worthless,

 You're taking up people's air,

and Travis wanted Jodi's heart to stop beating because she is a "corrupted carcass".

In telephone conversations heard in court, Travis had accused specific people of being without souls, even though he had no proof of that.


(7) We also know that Travis had an explosive temper towards those he considered a nobody like Jodi and this temper was witnessed by

both Gus Searcy and Desiree Freeman who were shocked at Travis' temper towards Jodi, which came all of a sudden with no warning.

The Prosecutor admitted that Travis threw a phone across the room, again showing Travis' temper.

Lisa Andrews Diadoni (Travis' ex-girlfriend ) said in court that she got scared when Travis lost his temper.

  Gus Searcy compared Travis' temper to a bullet, as he witnessed Jodi literally duck when Travis blasted Jodi over the phone.

Jodi's journal entry points to Travis temper at her which concurs with what  court witnesses said.

  Jodi's journal entry of 1/24/08:

  " I drained my checking account to put money into his (Travis) and then was hit with tons of fees, fees that he isn't going to pay, $96 worth. And he has the nerve to tell me to balance my checkbook.

  Nay, he (Travis) didn`t just tell me that, he screamed it at me, and

  then proceeded to say that he wants to get a gun and put it to his head and pull the trigger." (end of quote).


(8) People who are prone to violence often use violent language and between Jodi and Travis, Travis was the one using words like " blasting" people, "beating up" one person at least and "shredding people to pieces" ( words recorded in a telephone conversation between Jodi and Travis ).


(9) The sense of urgency in wanting to get married to a virginal Mormon girl put a  lot of stress on Travis and Jodi was the only one who could prevent a happy marriage and

here again is another motive to kill Jodi, the only one standing in the way of a happy married life since Jodi had audio evidence of Travis sexual deviancy and

the interrogation detective in the following link at the 21:45 timeline concurs with the view that Travis' time was running out regarding marriage:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vE_Ue5rF8QM


(10) Before the trip to Mexico, virginal Mormon Mimi rejected Travis as a potential husband and that rejection devastated Travis as he saw his chances of being married slipping away and that rejection was blamed on Jodi (in our opinion).


(11)     5/26/08 text messages from Travis  to Jodi showed he was planning his revenge, as Travis used the following phrases:

  "feel the wrath (Jodi)."

  " I promise you (Jodi) the punishment will be better".

   " After tomorrow, its gonna get real bad for you (Jodi)."






 (C) What actually happened ?


From court witnesses, Travis had the tendency to overreact to even the slightest problem and Jodi due to her past childhood abuse tended to want negative attention which means she would instigate those she loves but the instigation problem with Jodi was mild but on June 4th, it got out of hand when Jodi's instigation went a level up (details below ) which in turn contributed to Travis' overreaction which in turn led to the tragic events on June 4th.



The main reason Jodi kept lying about the events leading up to Travis death is because


Jodi felt guilty about instigating Travis, which triggered the rage within Travis (details below ) and the interrogation detective sensed that guilt  in Jodi at the 4:05 timeline in the link below :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6k29w7HjsVM


Jodi did feel guilty about instigating the events below but at the same time

 she knew she did not kill Travis because in Jodi's mind, killing meant "premeditated murder" which Jodi planned but hesitated in carrying  out.

Also remember what was stated at the very beginning of the post regarding the effects of PTSD where the  traumatic experience triggers a memory lapse and Jodi genuinely does not remember the actual killing.



Combining all eleven points in part (B) above, the actions of Jodi (below) pushed Travis over the edge:

When Travis said he was not going to take Jodi to Mexico, Jodi purposely dropped the camera while

  telling Travis that she was going to turn in audio recorded evidence (  statutory rape fantasies of  minors) to his church and  tell his bishop and

  potential future good Mormon virgin wives that Travis has

  rape fantasies

  of tying up and

  having anal sex with

 12 year old schoolgirls in pigtails and also "corking the pot" of little girls:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANNFSY5x-3w

  (In the above telephone recordings  heard in court, Travis  had already revealed his fascination with a 12 year old girl's orgasm ).

 According to the court transcript, this is exactly what Travis said to Jodi:

" The way you moan, baby, it sounds like -- it sounds like you are this 12-year-old girl having her first orgasm. It`s so hot." and

 later  in the audio recording, Travis said the following " corking the pot of a little girl" ( end of quote ).

Even if Travis was role-playing, what non-pedophile adult wants a girl to role-play a 12 year old girl having her first orgasm, which proves at the least, Travis was  a closet pedophile.

 For Travis to know what a 12 year old girl sounds like during her first orgasm, we should not be surprised if Travis had a collection of illegal child porn featuring 12 year old girls.

The fact that Mormons have been known to have multiple wives ( psychopaths tend to be greedy and covet power in having multiple sexual relationships at the same time ) and

 Mormons have been known to marry minors, it should not surprise us that Travis was actually thinking about a particular  12 year old girl's first orgasm as being hot.


Jodi threatening to tell on Travis ,enraged him because Travis knew the threat was real since

 Jodi had a recorded telephone conversation implicating Travis' statutory rape fantasies of minors.


On hearing Jodi's threat,  Travis got up to choke Jodi into submission.

Jodi got terrified at Travis' rage since

 males commit 93% of all murders since

 brain research (fMRI) finds that the right amygdala is activated in  men which calls for aggression when there exists  emotionally stressful stimuli, while

 women activate their left amygdala during emotionally stressful stimuli which explains the absence of the aggression  response in women.


We know that Travis rage shocked Jodi because even after Travis death, Jodi could not comprehend how a person she cared about can become so enraged and

that frightening side of Travis made Jodi suspicious of all males and

 that is why she told the interrogation detective that she bought a gun after Travis' death since

( in our opinion) she was not trusting of males anymore, after seeing the rage in Travis.


  On hearing Jodi's threat, Travis got up to choke Jodi into submission.

Being terrified at Travis rage, Jodi ran to get the gun.

Due to Travis' immense strength that even the interrogation detective stated that Travis possessed (details below )  we know Jodi did not use the the knife first but used  the gun  but

the reason she ended up using the knife is because she hesitated in pulling the trigger which enabled the enraged Travis knocking the gun off Jodi's hand.


 When Travis was about to attack Jodi,

there were four possible scenarios that resulted in Travis' death (listed below):


(1) The gun initially worked and Jodi pulled the trigger:

Under this scenario, Jodi would have repeatedly pulled the trigger until Travis died but we know this is not what happened

(2) The gun initially worked and Jodi hesitated to pull the trigger

Under this scenario, Travis would have grabbed or knocked the gun off Jodi's hand and used the gun against Jodi and Jodi would not have had time to defend herself with the knife.

In other words, Jodi would have been dead and Travis would have had to explain to the police that it was self defense, even though Jodi hesitated.

We know the above scenario did not happen either.

(3) The gun initially did not work and Jodi pulled the trigger:

Under this scenario, Travis would have knocked Jodi unconscious to the ground and either possibly called the police to have Jodi arrested or in a rage, he could have killed the unconscious Jodi and then reported to the police it was self defense

We know the above scenario did not happen either.


(4) The gun initially did not work and the Jodi hesitated in pulling the trigger:

This is the most plausible scenario (as supported by the physical evidence ) since we know that Travis must have either knocked the gun off Jodi's hand or struggled with Jodi and then took the gun while Jodi went for the knife and as the gun jammed in Travis' hand, Jodi got lucky in stabbing Travis in the chest.

 Knowing how strong Travis was, its not logical to assume that Jodi would have preferred the knife to the gun unless Jodi had the gun knocked off her hand.

Jodi could not have struck first because if she did, she would have used the gun and not the knife, knowing how strong Travis was and so,

 the only possible scenario is Jodi hesitated in using the gun and then the rest of the scene is a struggle for life because Jodi got lucky in stabbing Travis in the chest when the gun jammed in Travis' hand.

We believe Jodi is alive today because Travis had the gun in his hand  and that is how Jodi survived because the gun jammed and the rest of the scene is a struggle for life on Jodi's part.


  Travis went to get the gun while Jodi ( fearing that the enraged Travis would use the gun against her )  got the knife and started stabbing him in the back and head as he swung around with the gun but

  the gun jammed and Jodi got lucky and stabbed Travis in the chest.

  Travis tried to get the knife from Jodi while Jodi ( knowing that her life was in danger)  managed to cut his hands and his torso as he fell on her and

while Travis was on top of Jodi,  she started stabbing his back and head.


In the link below, at the 11:00 timeline, Jodi says Travis was very strong, she has never seen anybody work out like Travis and she could not get out of one of Travis wrestling holds on her, and she felt powerless :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSv2ohtbDWQ


Detective Flores concurs with Jodi  at the 27;51 timeline in the link below that Travis was strong, so strong that two or more people could have been involved in his killing, according to Detective Flores:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adPYz7YTjZg&index=6&list=PL71F4FE185A0B69EB


Detective Flores admits (at the 40;30 timeline in the link below) that since Travis was a big guy, it would have taken more than one person to kill Travis:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=adPYz7YTjZg&index=6&list=PL71F4FE185A0B69EB



 Jodi knew that Travis had tremendous strength and stamina and that if she stopped stabbing Travis, her life would be over since Travis was into

 wrestling,

 martial arts,

 boxing and

 body building.

  Travis lost strength within seconds and feeling sorry for him, Jodi helped him to the sink.

We know that Jodi felt sorry for Travis and helped him to the sink because

 its not logical to assume Travis would be standing above the sink and not trying to defend himself,  if he was being constantly attacked.

Would Travis actually allow an attack from behind ? We highly doubt it, especially if Travis had some strength left in him to stand above the sink.


Travis had a huge ego and the very thought of being beaten by a girl, especially a girl whom he considered as a nobody, enraged him and so

 while over the sink,  Travis started cursing Jodi (using all manner of demeaning words)

  as Jodi said she was going to get help from Travis' roommates.

The next event that took place can be explained by the blood evidence shown in court.

[ Note :  At the entrance to the bathroom hallway there is a very large smearing stain on the carpet meaning both Jodi and Travis were struggling for the knife which was in Jodi's hand and a much smaller and much darker stain beside the very large smear, that indicated blood was pooling after Travis throat was cut and his neck was bleeding which created the pooling of the blood ( the  much smaller but darker of the  two stains )].


  As Jodi was about to get out of the bathroom near the entrance to Travis' bedroom, Travis had managed to pounce on her from behind, grunting the words " you c(*)nt " and

  as he fell on her and  tried to get the knife from her, she plunged the knife into his neck and cut his throat in sheer terror .

The neck wound was 1 and 1/2 " in depth, so it corresponds to Travis being on top and so it was easier for Jodi to thrust upwards and make that 1  and 1/2" stab.

Here is the video regarding the 1 and 1/2 inch neck wound :




 Jodi could not have been behind Travis when she made the neck wound because the angle of the wound is consistent with Jodi being at the bottom and Travis on top (showing that Travis was trying to get the knife from Jodi ) because

 the 1 and 1/2 inch deep wound is at an angle with the blade pointed towards Travis' head which could not have been made if Jodi was behind Travis

 ( if she was behind Travis, she would have had to twist her hand downwards to make that cut which is not logical because

 people don't push their hand downwards to make a cut since the back of the hand is usually pointing straight in line with the arm when making cuts). 



Jodi managed to push Travis off her and she knew he was dead.

  while weeping and blinded by tears , Jodi dragged the body back into the bathroom.

 Jodi was shocked to see Travis glaring his eyes and baring his teeth at her, even though he was dead and

 terrified that he might pounce at her again  (since Jodi was not thinking straight),

  Jodi used the gun on the dead body and the gun worked.


When she found out the roommates were not home, she made up her mind to protect Travis "virginal" image in the Mormon church and

  the only way to protect Travis reputation was to make everybody think that  it was total strangers who did the killing because

  she knew if she was implicated in the killing, Travis' sexual deviancy regarding 12 year olds and the fantasies of statutory rapes of little girls would be found out since she had audio evidence (of Travis' deviancy) in her possession.


One of the first things Jodi mentioned during the police interrogations was her desire to protect Travis reputation regarding sex (watch at the 13:50 timeline in the link below ):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vE_Ue5rF8QM

At the 10:29 timeline in the link below, the detective was wondering whether its Travis' reputation that Jodi was protecting because Jodi was not telling about the events leading up to Travis killing :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzt4clYkmPQ

Ryan Burns (Jodi's boyfriend) concurs with the above interrogation detective ( at the 56:36 timeline in the link below ) that Jodi did not want Travis sexuality to be revealed to the public:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlKO5mdtVRw


At the same time, Jodi did experience PTSD (as stated at the beginning of this post ) and the symptoms are listed in the medical link below:

http://www.webmd.com/mental-health/tc/post-traumatic-stress-disorder--symptoms


Summarizing from the link above, Jodi experienced the following symptoms of PTSD:


(1) PTSD symptoms usually start soon after the traumatic event, but they may not happen until months or years later and so Jodi's behavior with Ryan Burns, 24 hours after Travis' death should not surprise anybody since symptoms of PTSD can be manifested even years after the traumatic event.


(2)  PTSD symptoms involve forgetting about parts of the traumatic event or not be able to talk about them.


(3) PTSD symptoms involve  trouble concentrating and you will notice this during the interrogation interviews when sometimes Jodi would be speaking about something else, other than what the detective is trying to convey to Jodi.


(4) Another sign of PTSD is, Jodi feared for her safety and she told the interrogation detective that she bought a gun after Travis' death.


(5) Another sign of PTSD is feelings of shame, despair, or hopelessness and Jodi revealed to the interrogation detectives that her situation was hopeless and we know that Jodi felt shame for instigating Travis' rage on the day Travis died.


(6) Another sign of PTSD is difficulty in controlling  emotions.

At the 25:20 timeline Jodi is calm and eating and then suddenly she starts crying, which is a definite sign of PTSD:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sn6mWpXa5zs


(7) Another sign of PTSD is impulsive or self-destructive behavior.

We see Jodi exhibiting impulsive or self-destructive behavior when she suddenly changes her mind about the course of her trial proceedings (example: saying that death is better than life in prison or  not wanting to plead for her life in front of the jury etc )


Also, notice in the interrogation video, she has her knees up to her chest (like a little girl would do ) and then just like a little girl who plays with two dolls, telling the therapist what happened regarding abuse etc,


 Jodi talks about two individuals who killed Travis (due to the leading and prompting of the interrogation detective ) because


confessing to the killing of Travis was too much for Jodi to admit to since Jodi knew that any confession about killing Travis would result in more emotional abuse from Travis' family and friends , the same kind of emotional abuse that  Jodi has been facing all her life.




IN CLOSING:

The fact that there does exist the psychological phenomenon called "mob mentality" used in lynchings in the past should give the Appeals Court one added reason to call for a retrial with jury sequestration the next time around

We believe Jodi Arias has a strong case for an appeal because most of the trial was concentrated on Jodi lying.


By concentrating on the lies Jodi said, we believe it prejudiced the entire case against Jodi when the case should only have involved the question of premeditation.


Lying does not make a person a murderer but because the Prosecution made it sound that the numerous lies said by Jodi made her a murderer made it a very prejudicial case against Jodi.

Words do not make a person evil.

One forensic investigator said that she was looking for blood that was "pretty".

 Does that mean that investigator was a psychopath or evil because she used the word "pretty" in referring to a tragedy ? off course not.

 Words do not make a person evil, its what they actually do and not what they say that makes a person evil or not.


 Jodi wanting to be interviewed by the Media in the beginning was to protect Travis' reputation and Jodi is lying today due to her deep guilt for instigating Travis into his rage on the day he died and also Jodi's lies are due to her desire (at least in the beginning ) to protect Travis' reputation and to protect Travis' family from the truth about Travis' deviancy 




Also,  we believe that Jodi Arias has a strong case for an appeal because throughout the trial, at numerous times, Travis is referred to as the "victim" and even the word "murdered" was used  and we believe the above words used are highly prejudicial in a capital murder case and could have influenced the jury members before deliberation took place in the jury room.

In a capital murder case, the deceased should never be referred to as the victim since that is highly prejudicial language.

The Judge referred to Travis as the victim ( highly prejudicial against Jodi ) meaning the Judge was telling the jury that Travis was innocent surrounding the circumstances of his death and Jodi was guilty and being guilty in a capital murder case would mean at the least, life in prison without parole.


Would the Judge have liked it if the defense team kept referring to Jodi as the survivor ?


Watch at the 50:00 timeline in the video below, the word "murdered" was used and this is just one of numerous examples of the words "victim" and "murdered" were used:






Even at trial, why was Jodi not able to tell the whole truth ? because not only did Jodi feel guilty about instigating Travis into his rage,

people in extremely traumatic situations (example: an accident ) only remember the start of the traumatic event and the end but nothing in between (as stated in the beginning of this post ) and

that is why Jodi is not able to recall the sequence of events during the trauma plus the fact that

in Jodi's mind, she did not kill Travis because

 in Jodi's mind, killing means premeditation but

 since she hesitated in actually pulling the trigger, to Jodi, she did not kill him and

 the traumatic events that followed the hesitation in pulling the trigger led to the "memory haze" that most people feel in the middle of a trauma or accident.


So how do we get at the whole truth or can we at least meet the standard of " reasonable doubt " ?

To get to the standard of "reasonable doubt", we need to look at all sources, both inside and outside of jail, in order to come as close as possible to the whole truth and not just what was revealed in court.


 As for Travis, due to his troubled past, he  developed multiple personalities ( at least one of those personalities was evil ) that led to fantasies of sexual deviancy.


 In a letter to Chris and Sky Hughes ( Travis' friends ), Travis tells the Hughes that Jodi suspects that there is evil residing within him (Travis).

 In replying to Travis, Sky Hughes tells Travis that Jodi was being treated horribly by Travis ( not physically but emotionally ) and that the Hughes had witnessed Jodi cry due to the actions of Travis.

 Sky Hughes accuses Travis of being a "heart predator and  stringing Jodi along".

 Sky Hughes tells Travis:  " you (Travis ) get great joy in making women fall for the T-dogg and you (Travis) laugh about what you can get away with"(end of quote). 

Detective Flores at the 3:33 timeline in the link below admits that Travis was a "player" who tells girls he loves them while still seeing other girls:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gglhBzgDly8



 Sky Hughes was so detested by Travis behavior that she told Travis that she would not allow her younger sister to date Travis.

 The evil that resided within Travis ( mentioned in Travis' letter to the Hughes ) would result in Travis' suddenly losing his temper only to those like Jodi whom he considered as a nobody.


 Travis has a better case when it comes to psychopathy and here is the list:

(1) Aggressive language is often used by psychopaths and Travis was full of aggressive language, using words like "blasting" people, "ripping to shreds" regarding people he did not like  and "beating up" at least one person mentioned in telephone recordings heard in court.

(2) Statutory rape fantasies are a sign of psychopathy when Travis was recorded saying " corking the pot of a little girl".

 (3) Males commit 93% of all murders since brain research (fMRI) finds that the right amygdala is activated in  men which calls for aggression when there exists  emotionally stressful stimuli,

while women activate their left amygdala during emotionally stressful stimuli which explains the absence of the aggression  response in women.

 (4) Sky Hughes (Travis's friend) stated that Travis would refer to himself as the T-Dogg who would laugh at what he (Travis ) can get away with regarding women.

 (5) the Hughes ( Travis's friends)  accusing Travis of stringing along Jodi when Travis had no intention of marrying Jodi.

 (6) Both Gus Searcy and Desiree Freeman were shocked at Travis' temper towards Jodi, which came all of a sudden with no warning.

 (7) Travis admitting to the Hughes ( Travis' friends) that he (Travis) was a sociopath (In our opinion, Travis was also a psychopath).

 (8) Sky Hughes (Travis's friend ) accusing Travis of being a predator.

 (9) Sky Hughes (Travis' friend ) was so detested by Travis' behavior that she told Travis that she will not allow her younger sister to date Travis.

 (10) Travis' fantasies of tying up and raping Jodi. (no normal person will even think of tying up and raping a girl, unless that person is a sadist or psychopath).

 (11) Travis telling Jodi that she sounded like a 12 year old girl when Jodi had an orgasm .( highly abnormal behavior of a grown man fantasizing about 12 year old girls having their first orgasms ).

 (12) The last few months in Travis' life was spent degrading Jodi ( a psychopathic trait ) and in degrading Jodi, it was that much easier to kill Jodi (when Jodi threatened to tell on Travis ) because the first step killers take in killing is to make the victim a nobody or subhuman.

 (13) Travis was having a double life ( a psychopathic characteristic ), pretending to be a virginal Mormon.

 (14) Travis looked down on specific people, saying they had no souls even though he had no evidence of that ( another psychopathic characteristic that looks down on people ).

(15) Between the two, its Travis who implied Jodi should not be alive. when Travis said : "  (Jodi) You're taking up people's air." (end of quote).

 Psychopaths often refer to people as not deserving to live.

(16) Travis got excited and enjoying seeing people bruised and battered and that is why he organized celebratory UFC parties.

We are not saying all people who watch UFC are psychopaths but we are saying that if a person is psychopath, that psychopath  would enjoy seeing people being bruised and battered

(17) Travis often referred to  himself in the third person, as " Mr. Alexander" and the "T-Dogg" and people with huge egos can be psychopaths at the same time.

(18) Last but not least, just looking at all the pictures of Travis and Jodi, Travis looks more like a psychopath who had a huge ego with his "know it all, arrogant" look while Jodi does not have that psychopathic look.



 Unlike true killers, Jodi had the following characteristics that do not point to her being a killer:

 (1) Being shy in a crowd of strangers ( spree or serial killers can be shy, but Jodi was not a serial or spree killer ).

 Studies show that introverted young people are less prone to violence.

(2) Not losing her temper even when the Prosecutor was doing his very best to get Jodi to lash out or lose her temper.

Notice that Jodi said that the Prosecutor was screaming at her and he did not disagree with the term, "screaming".

While the Prosecutor was "screaming" at Jodi, notice how much more control Jodi had while  the Prosecutor was "out of control" in losing his temper with Jodi throughout the cross examination in court.

 (3) No history of violence or abusing her former boyfriends or other people.

 (4) No history of drug use

 (5) crying over one incident where she kicked a dog ( true killers hardly cry over animals).

 (6) Jodi showed signs of abuse (happy one hour and crying the next, according to her friends and parents ) but no signs of violence even when she had panic attacks.

 (7) Jodi did not financially benefit from Travis's death ( true killers usually take out a life insurance policy on the victim, before killing the victim ) .

 (8) Jodi could have used the gas cans she brought with her to burn down the house but she did not ( true killers have been known to burn down the crime scene or burn the victims of their crime ).

 (9) Jodi was selfless. Jodi lent Travis money to the point where Jodi was broke due to lending money to Travis.

 Jodi's journal entry on 1/24/08: " I've  been squeezed dry and then some because of him (Travis)."

  When Darryl Brewer was broke, Jodi was more than willing to share her bank account of over $12,000 with Darryl.  ( true killers are almost always selfish and don't give away their money ).

(10) Jodi had very few intimate relationships while true criminals have either  numerous victims and/or intimate relationships.

(11) In the interrogation tapes, Jodi revealed she had fears and one fear is the fear of not being respected by people. Psychopaths do not fear being not respected but rather true psychopaths get angry at not being respected, so again,

Jodi did not show a psychopathic characteristic due to her fears while anger was absent.


(12) Watch at the 8:09 timeline below, where Jodi cries out and shows clear empathy for Travis' family and friends. Psychopaths do not feel empathy and do not cry over other people's feelings:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5lGJ72SQBM


(13) At the 8:45 timeline  ( in the link below ) the interrogation detective states that Jodi is a spiritual caring person which does not fit the characteristics of a psychopath:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMNd_-FGftM


(14) The interrogation detective says that Jodi is concerned about other people's happiness  (which psychopaths do not exhibit). Watch at the 28:15 timeline ( in the link below):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eMNd_-FGftM


(15) Even though the Miranda Rights were read to Jodi and she could have kept silent, she kept talking to the detectives because of her fear of being disliked.

As we said before, psychopaths get angry when people do not like them but Jodi feels fear instead of anger, again proving she is not a psychopath.


(16) If Jodi was a psychopath, she would have taken the camera with her since true killers have been known to take pictures with them in order to cherish the final moments of the killing  but

 Jodi chose to not keep any of the last pictures of Travis, again proving Jodi is not a psychopath.

(17) At the 10:40 timeline in the link below, Jodi is clearly shaken by what happened to Travis, showing again she is not a psychopath since psychopaths do not have any real feelings for the dead :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSv2ohtbDWQ

(18) At the 12:59 timeline in the link below, like a little girl, Jodi was on the floor and when nobody was watching, you can see Jodi wiping away tears and you can hear her sob quietly (she did not know there was a camera in the room) and

 Jodi started weeping even louder at the  13:55 timeline in the link below.

This is not what psychopaths do, they don't cry when nobody is around.

Psychopaths only feel anger when nobody is around:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CSv2ohtbDWQ


(19) The detective has probably seen fake remorse but in the link below at the 5:55 timeline, she says Jodi's tears are real :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzt4clYkmPQ

Again, psychopaths do not have real remorse but Jodi did.

(20)  Again at the 11:29 timeline in the above link, Jodi shows concern about what Travis' family are going through, another sign she is not a psychopath since psychopath hardly are concerned about the family of their victims.

(21) Cries about Travis' good side at the 22:10 timeline in the above link again showing Jodi does not fit the description of a psychopath since psychopaths never talk about the good somebody does especially the good their victims have done.

(22) In the video below, at the 00:10:27, Travis himself agrees that Jodi is a "giver " and not a " taker " again showing that Jodi does not fit the description of a psychopath :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ANNFSY5x-3w

(23) Ryan Burns agrees at the 55:00 timeline in  the link below that Jodi was trying to bring him closer to God and she was sincere in her religious convictions, again showing she is not a psychopath. Psychopaths get involved in religion for financial gain:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlKO5mdtVRw

(24) Once again, when nobody was around, Jodi starts crying again at the 5:10 timeline in the link below, which again shows she is not a psychopath because true psychopaths do not cry when nobody is not around but rather, true psychopaths get angry when nobody is around :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nzt4clYkmPQ&list=PLrAJFqIjBGeBWQ8jumn4nJ92njqRQwm0k&index=11


(25) When shown the dead body of  Travis in the shower, Jodi looks away at the 1;30;35 timeline in the link below :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OUFBQD-DP5k&list=PL71F4FE185A0B69EB&index=7


Again at the 1;32;25 timeline  and again at the 1;35;01 in the link above, Jodi is clearly shaken by pictures of the dead Travis and looks away.

No psychopath will look away because psychopaths get a thrill at looking at their dead victim but Jodi looked away, again proving she is not a psychopath

(26) At the 17:25 timeline in the link below, Ryan Burns clearly states he did not want Jodi to regret her visit to Ryan's house and so

 Ryan did not push Jodi into greater sexual intimacy, meaning, Jodi did show self control during the intimate moment she had with Ryan :

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OlKO5mdtVRw&index=9&list=PL71F4FE185A0B69EB

So Jodi cannot be called a slut even though being a slut does not make a person a sexual deviant

 unlike Travis who was definitely a sexual deviant, at least in terms of Travis fantasies about statutory rape of a minor child when Travis said the words "corking the pot of a little girl ".

(27) The more we see this case, the more we see Jodi as a "child who clings to her parents after a traumatic experience" and

 Travis used that weakness to his advantage, telling people Jodi was stalking, so he could have his "cake and eat it too".

You can see her child like behavior when she started crying in the interrogation room when no one was in the room and while crying, she got on the floor and almost went under the table.

The above is not the behavior of a psychopath.

(28) True psychopaths love to display their naked victim in a graphic way but Jodi attempted to give Travis a dignified pose by trying to make him as dignified as possible by putting the body into the shower stall

(29) Its remarkable that Jodi is still friends with at least two ex-boyfriends because Jodi is a forgiving person and too bad the media does not see that she is not a psychopath.


(30) Compared to 12 and 13 year old killers who clearly showed no remorse in the killing of their dad ( https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W9ucr3g-x6A ) Jodi has shown symptoms of being child like ( example: clinging to Travis )  and yet Jodi showed much more remorse than those kids who killed their dad



CONCLUSION:

We cannot rely on Jodi's stories since we know by now that Jodi has a strong desire to not admit to instigating Travis' into his rage (details above ) and 

admitting to that would mean being subject to more emotional abuse from the media and from Travis family and friends.

If it was premeditation from beginning to the end, why did Jodi take off her gloves before she opened the front door ? knowing her covert trip would be blown if her finger prints were all over the place.

The reason she took off the gloves is she changed her mind about killing Travis before she opened the front door without  the gloves and she did not mind her finger prints being all over the place.

Even when threatened by Travis, Jodi could not pull the trigger and that hesitation resulted in a struggle for life with Travis getting the gun and Jodi getting the knife.

Jodi did not have defensive wounds because Travis had the gun and tried to use it but it jammed while Jodi got lucky in stabbing Travis in the chest which made Travis helpless within seconds but

Jodi did not realize that and by sheer terror kept stabbing because she sincerely thought her life would be over if she stopped stabbing.

Also,the scene of the killing does not point to premeditation since we know that Jodi was a photographer and

she could have easily put the camera away safely before committing the killing but

the fact that the camera was shooting accidental photos shows a sudden turn of events and not to premeditation.

The blood evidence also showed a struggle for life.

For example, at the entrance to the bathroom hallway there is a very large smearing stain on the carpet meaning both Jodi and Travis were struggling for the knife which was in Jodi's hand and

a much smaller and much darker stain beside the very large smear, that indicated blood was pooling after Travis throat was cut and his neck was bleeding which created the pooling of the blood ( the much smaller but darker of the stains ).


You can clearly see in the interrogation videos, both detectives were trying their best to make Jodi confess to the lesser charge of manslaughter and not premeditated murder because

the detectives themselves, after looking at all the physical evidence and the stories from Travis friends and family, still could not believe it was premeditated.


We know Travis had a good side and that is why Jodi kept going back to him because he definitely had a sweet side but sadly

 Travis himself confessed to the Hughes that he was a sociopath and we know sociopaths have multiple personalities and

 in the case of Travis (even though Jodi instigated the events leading up to his death ) Jodi was still shocked at the extent of Travis' rage when she said she was going to turn him in ( to his Bishop and prospective virginal wives) for his statutory rape fantasies.


Jodi was mentally tormented and even the slightest physical injury can be magnified in  Jodi's mind, especially when Jodi was vulnerable during childhood in which she was affected by emotional and/or physical abuse.


Travis took advantage of a mentally tormented  Jodi, resulting in

  Travis sexually using Jodi's body parts for his own selfish pleasure and

 in using Jodi's body parts, Travis emotionally abused Jodi which exacerbated Jodi's mental torment and

  in the end, she just could not bring herself to pulling the trigger.


Jodi will never admit to wanting to kill Travis with the gun she got from her grandparents' home because of the following:

(1) In her mind, because she hesitated in pulling the trigger, she did not kill Travis.

(2) She genuinely does not remember the actual killing because just like an accident, its too traumatic and the mind shuts down and can't remember .

(3) She feels guilty in instigating Travis' rage on the day of his death.

(4) She is too afraid of further emotional abuse from the media, Travis' friends and family.

(5) To Jodi, admitting to wanting to kill Travis and then changing her mind is to admit to being a killer and Jodi does not think of herself as a killer.


 Yes, Travis' killing was premeditated up to the point Jodi arrived at Travis' house but in the end,

  Jodi could not bring herself to pull the trigger which enabled the enraged sexual deviant Travis to knock the gun off her hand and then

  the rest of the crime scene shows a very chaotic struggle for life on Jodi's part and she got lucky in stabbing Travis in the chest.

Last but not least, between Travis and Jodi,  Travis was the one showing deviant behavior:

laughing at what the "T-Dogg" can get away with ( words from Sky Hughes, Travis' good friend ),

 Travis was a  predator ( word used by Sky Hughes ),

having UFC parties at his home because Travis got excited over  watching people being bruised and battered,

Travis wanted to beat up at least one person,

Travis' talk of sex all the time was referred to as "vulgar" by one of Travis' girlfriends

getting excited over thinking about a 12 year old girl's first orgasm and

having fantasies of "corking the pot of a little girl". (all presented in court as evidence ).


Friday, May 2, 2014

OVERVIEW OF THE SEVEN PART BLOG


PLEASE DO READ PART SEVEN OF THIS SEVEN PART BLOG THAT WILL DISCUSS

A NEW AND MUCH BETTER FORM  OF GOVERNMENT CALLED " AN INTELLECTOCRACY ".

OVERVIEW OF THE SEVEN PART BLOG:

Keep reminding yourself throughout this seven part blog, the following:

Over 8000 veterans commit suicide every year on average ( almost one tragic suicide every hour and on average 22 tragic suicides daily )

because war is about our vulnerable soldiers seeing the immense suffering of the innocent,

seeing the innocent being maimed or

deformed or

blinded or 

disfigured or 

paralyzed and being fed through a tube for life,


due to collateral damage,


seeing the horror of war, our vulnerable soldiers end up devastating their families by committing suicide by the thousands,

while the Swiss live in peace without enemies due to the Swiss non-militant interventionist policies.

Pro-war politicians are willing to collaterally kill as many innocent people as it takes for the so-called "greater good" which is detailed in the book written by highly decorated US Marine Corp Major General Smedley Butler . 

The title of the book is "War Is A Racket" in which General Butler says war is all about profits, which to the defense contractors is the so-called "greater good"


US defense contractors and their puppet politicians constantly exaggerate the threat of the enemy, so that

the American public are too afraid to notice

hundreds of billions being borrowed every year from places like China which will inevitably lead to financial disaster for America.


US Generals do not object because 

they have perks like the use of 234 US military golf courses around the world,

US armed forces ski center in the Bavarian Alps and 

71 luxury Lear jets to whisk them around the world and

when Generals retire, they are rewarded for their silence by

being given seats on the executive boards of defense sector companies.


US defense contractors get a big slice of the 1.1-1.4 trillion dollars spent on so-called defense every year (base DOD budget plus other national security programs plus the interest on the debt from past unnecessary wars ).

The US government spends more on defense than all the world's defense budgets put together.

By borrowing hundreds of billions a year in order to maintain the US government's worldwide military empire, the inevitable bankruptcy of the US government will happen when

the annual interest on the national debt exceeds a trillion dollars a year .

WHEN THE INEVITABLE BANKRUPTCY HAPPENS,

the best we can hope for is the Union remains intact and powers go back to the states as it was before the Civil War while

there will be drastic cuts in essential government services like food/water/environmental safety and

tens of millions of Americans will have their net worth drastically reduced due to the US government defaulting on its US bond debt obligations.


To prevent the bankruptcy of our government, the financial disaster to US bond holding Americans, drastic cuts in essential government services like food/water/environmental safety and

for a comprehensive peace agreement with the muslim world that defense contractors will not be happy with and

that is different from the peace agreement made between President Reagan and the Islamists in Soviet Afghanistan,


read all seven parts of this blog.

The blog will also show that war results in terrorism and here is one of numerous examples :

The U.S. Staff Sgt. Robert Bales  who murdered 16 Afghan villagers in 2012 says he had lost compassion for Iraqis and Afghans over the course of his four combat deployments.

"My mind was consumed by war," Bales wrote late last year.


"I planted war and hate for the better part of 10 years and harvested violence," he added.

Out of war emerge mass murderers like Hitler who was the product of WW1 (details below ).


Also, war is about sacrificing the lives of the innocent,


the destitute,

 the poor,

the sick,

 the hungry,

 the elderly,

 the handicapped,

 the children and

 the babies through

 collateral damage for the so-called "greater good" which always involves

not national security but rather

financial security for the owners of the warfare complex who "laugh all the way to the bank" as stated by

 highly decorated US Marine Corp Major General Smedley Butler in his book titled " War Is a Racket" and

 while the puppet politicians of the warfare complex send the poor and powerless deliberately into harm's way.



 FOR NON-MILITANT INTERVENTIONIST POLICIES AS A MUCH BETTER ALTERNATIVE TO PROFIT DRIVEN WARS OR CONFLICTS, READ ALL SEVEN PARTS OF THE BLOG .


The reason our economy is struggling is because up to 1400 billion is being sucked away every year from the economy and given to those who do not create economically profitable ventures but rather create

 more corporate welfare as they "laugh all the way to the bank" while trying to convince you that you need the "insurance" against the "boogeyman" .

 This "boogeyman" scare enables government supporters in the corporate welfare system to get away with not accounting for 8.5 trillion dollars of hard earned taxpayers money that has either been wasted, stolen or missing.

 Do we really need to spend up to 1.4 trillion every year ( hundreds of billions of which are being borrowed from places like China) as insurance against this "boogeyman" ?

Read all Seven Parts of this Seven Part Blog and you will realize that  100 billion a year is more than enough to insure against the "boogeyman".

Remember, 100% of your income taxes and almost half of US government revenues is going towards insuring against the "boogeyman" which means,

 maintaining the US government's world wide military empire that cannot be sustained.

 National security spending consists of the base DOD budget plus



 nuclear weapons research, maintenance, cleanup, and production, which is in the Department of Energy budget, plus Veterans Affairs, plus the Treasury Department's payments in pensions to military retirees and widows and their families, plus State Department financing of foreign arms sales and militarily-related development assistance, plus the national security budget within the Department of Homeland Security, plus counter-terrorism spending by the Federal Bureau of Investigation, plus intelligence-gathering spending by NASA plus interest on the debt due to past unnecessary wars.


 In 2012 the government took in about 2.45 trillion in revenues ( while the lowest estimate for national security spending was 1.1 trillion (about 45% of revenues ).


IF THE US GOVERNMENT DOES NOT GIVE UP ITS WORLD WIDE MILITARY EMPIRE,
 

 the inevitable bankruptcy of the US government will come a lot sooner when the interest payment on the national debt exceeds a trillion dollars a year since

 the present spending on the US government's military empire is as much as 1400 billion a year (base DOD budget plus other national security programs plus interest on the debt due to past unnecessary wars).

 Remember, the US government's national security budget takes up  100% of your income taxes and as much as 50% of  revenues taken in by the government and that cannot be sustained.


WHEN THE INEVITABLE BANKRUPTCY HAPPENS,

 the best we can hope for is the Union remains intact and powers go back to the states as it was before the Civil War while

 tens of millions of Americans will have their net worth drastically reduced due to the US government defaulting on its US bond debt obligations

and for the average American,  there will be drastic cuts in essential government services like food/water/environmental/infrastructure safety.

 If the US government gives up its world wide military empire, we would save hundreds of billions a year in giving up the US government's military overseas which would result in

 the world going back to the "Napoleonic Era" when countries paid for their own defense instead of relying on the US government to pay for their defense and

 in paying for their own defense, they were able to defeat Napoleon with no help from the US government.

Below is one of numerous examples that the puppet politicians of the profit agenda of the  warfare complex pose a very grave danger to the well-being of people around the world and

the well-being of the poor and powerless in America who are sent deliberately into harm's way, not for national security but rather the financial security of the owners of the warfare complex:


The US government did not learn the lesson of 300 years of violence begetting violence between the British/US governments and the Native Americans and because of not wanting to learn that violence begets violence ( due to the underlying profit motive behind every act of war according to highly decorated US Marine Corp Major General Smedley Butler) the US government got militantly involved in WW1 which in turn beget WW2.

300 years of the cycle of violence (violence begetting violence) between the British/US Governments and the Native Americans should have taught the US government to be a Peacemaker between the British and the German government during WW1 instead of 

the US government supporting the blockade of Germany that was starving the Germans and instead of the US government supplying weapons to the allies that were contributing to the deaths of Germans and that is how the German government declared US shipping as hostile to Germany.


Hindsight from 1776 ( details below ) should have taught the  US government not to get involved in WW1 but instead of learning from hindsight,

the US government created the dangerous conditions under which Nazism and Communism flourished in Europe after WW1 that eventually led to WW2 and the holocaust (details below).

The US government did the equivalent of letting two killers loose ( Hitler and Stalin) and then blamed the killers for the subsequent killings without taking any responsibility for letting those killers loose in the first place ( details below ).

According to historian Thomas Fleming, in his book "The Illusion of Victory: America in World War I" Fleming states :

  "Without the backing of American weaponry, munitions and loans, the Allies would have been forced to abandon their goal of the knockout blow.

 The war might have ended in 1915 or 1916 with a negotiated peace based on the mutual admission that the conflict had become a stalemate" (end of quote).


In other words,  the Treaty of Versailles would not have existed if Germany had won and

the only way Germany could have won is if the US government did not have a militant policy during WW1, that resulted in

the US government arming the allies which made Germany an enemy when the US government refused to stop arming the allies which was  contributing to the deaths of Germans and

 the US government refused to stop the starvation of the German people by not ending the blockade of Germany by the allies during WW1.

During WW1,through the treaty of Brest-Litovsk, Germany was keeping Russia from becoming a world communist power but

 the defeat of Germany at the hands of the US government enabled Russia to break the treaty and then

 Russia went onto become a world communist power resulting in tens of millions dying under communism.


In other words, WW1 beget

 WW2, the Zionist-Palestinian conflict, communist expansion and

 WW2 beget the Cold War and

 behind all the above wars and conflicts was the militant interventionist policies of the US government that beget war after war and conflict after conflict including the recent "war on terrorism".




The US government was very much involved in WW1 from the very beginning, starting with

American banks wanting to profit from the war by loaning money to the Allies  when the US government already knew from their 1776 hindsight that violence begets more violence

 ( example: 300 years of the cycle of violence between the British/US governments and Native Americans from 1622 through 1911   ).

Highly decorated US Marine Corp Major General Smedley Butler states in his book titled " War is a Racket", that WW1 was all about the profit agenda of the warfare complex and their puppet politicians in the US government.




Instead of making the profit agenda of the rich and powerful as their priority, hindsight should have taught the US government that a militant interventionist policy is not the answer to solving problems.

 Militant interventionist policies by the British resulted in hundreds of years of  terrorism from Native Americans and drawing from that experience (hindsight),

 the US government should not have had a  militant interventionist policy during WW1 which resulted in

the destruction of the Ottoman Empire and the subsequent Zionist-Palestinian conflict,

communists extending their power to become a world power and

WW2 and the terrorism from Hitler since Hitler blamed the Jews for the defeat of Germany during WW1.


 "The core of Hitler's hatred of the Jews lies at the defeat of Germany in WW1," said historian and journalist Dr Joachim Riecker, "where Hitler blamed the Jews for the defeat of Germany, the collapse of the monarchy and the ruination of millions".

 In the book titled 'November 9: How World War One Led to the Holocaust', the historian Dr Joachim Riecker examines the speeches both public and private of Hitler to try to solve the riddle of how a dictator could morph into the industrial-scale murderer of an entire people.



The entire discussion below will show that the violence of war is not the answer to the profit driven motives of the short sighted, militant US government because

 war begets war and in the case of the US government winning WW1, the consequence of that victory in turn beget WW2 and the resulting tragedy of the holocaust.


 For non-interventionist policies as a much better alternative to a profit driven war, read the end of this post for the link to non-interventionist policies.


 According to a comrade, Hans Mend, Hitler was in depression during WW1 and would leap up, and running about excitedly, say that "in spite of our big guns, victory would be denied us, for the invisible foes (Jews) of the German people were a greater danger than the biggest cannon of the enemy" (end of quote ).


 WW1 put Hitler in the hospital due to a bomb shrapnel and Hitler recalled in 1941 how WW1 made him enter politics as he wrote ""I brought back home with me my experiences at the (WW1) front; out of them I built my National Socialist community."


After hearing about Germany's defeat in WW1 at the hands of the US government  and the subsequent Treaty of Versailles,  Hitler said,

"When I was confined to bed, the idea came to me that I would liberate Germany, that I would make it great. I knew immediately that it would be realized" (end of quote ).


Hitler gained popularity for his rowdy polemic speeches against the Treaty of Versailles.


In a speech to the Reichstag on 17 May 1933, Adolf Hitler denounced the Treaty of Versailles because, in part, it had imposed such large reparations payments as to leave Germany in economic shambles.


Hitler entered politics in order to exploit the cruel attributes of the Treaty of Versailles to his advantage while, Hitler blamed the Jews for Germany's defeat during WW1.

The holocaust happened due to WW2 and

 WW2 happened due to Britain declaring war on Germany and

 the declaration of war on Germany was due to Germany's invasion of Poland and

Germany's invasion of Poland was due to Hitler wanting to prevent the persecution of German Poles at the hands of the Poles.

 Hitler warned the allies that if another war was declared on Germany, the Jews would pay (since Hitler blamed the Jews for Germany's defeat during WW1 )

and that is how the holocaust happened due to Britain declaring war on Germany and

if Britain had not declared war on Germany there would not have been a holocaust and

 Hitler would have continued with The Haavara Agreement that was designed to help facilitate the emigration of German Jews to Palestine.


How did the US government defeat Germany during WW1 ?

Since Britain ran out of money,

 the U.S. government extended cash and supplies to its European allies, expending more than $7 billion in US government funds,
 way before the entry of the US government into WW1 while

supporting the blockade of Germany by the Allies that was starving the German people.


 Before the US government appeared on the scene, the Allies were in a stalemate (trench warfare ) with Germany even though

 the US government was supplying military equipment to the Allies and Germany was fighting a two front war with Russia and the Allies and

even then,

 Germany was  still able to defeat Russia during WW1 which resulted in the treaty of Brest-Litovsk and

 the Treaty had the effect of preventing communism from becoming a world power until

 the US government made the Treaty void, enabling Russia to become a world communist power.
 


We would not have heard about Hitler if the US government did not have a militant interventionist policy during WW1 which resulted in

 Germany losing to the US government's million man military and

the subsequent Treaty of Versailles which created the dangerous conditions under which Hitler rose to power.


Should the US government be held responsible for Hitler's rise to power ?

Would you blame the person for letting a tiger out of its cage, so similarly,

the US government helped Hitler and Stalin by creating the dangerous conditions for Nazism and Communism to flourish as the result of

 the US government's one million man personnel defeating Germany during WW1.


If Germany had won WW1, the following would have happened:

(1) Germany restraining Russia (through the treaty of Brest-Litovsk) from becoming a world communist power.

(2) Hitler stating his injuries that landed him in hospital during WW1 was worth it.

 (3) No Treaty of Versailles.

  (4) Hitler not hating the Treaty of Versailles because the Treaty would not have existed.

 (5) Hitler not hating his own government because he would have thought of his government as honorable for winning WW1.

 (6) Hitler not hating the Jews for Germany losing WW1 if Germany had actually won WW1.

 In other words, if Germany was triumphant after WW1, Hitler would not have had the motivation to enter politics and

 even if Hitler did enter politics in the midst of a triumphant Germany,

winning WW1 would have put Germany in a much better political position to deal with Hitler while

 Hitler who tried to overthrow the German government for losing WW1 would not have had the motivation to overthrow the German government if

 the German government had actually won WW1.

At the same time, even if Hitler did gain power in a triumphant Germany that won WW1, Hitler would have continued the policies of previous governments in Europe in treating Jews as second class citizens and

 no holocaust or the expulsion of Jews would have happened.



 SO THE ONLY CONCLUSION ONE CAN DRAW IS:

 The US government's short sighted, profit driven militant interventionist policies during WW1 created the dangerous conditions under which

 Nazism and Communism flourished in Europe after WW1 that eventually led to WW2 and the holocaust.

FOR NON-MILITANT INTERVENTIONIST POLICIES AS A MUCH BETTER ALTERNATIVE TO PROFIT DRIVEN WARS OR CONFLICT,

 READ PART SIX OF THE BLOG .



The Pentagon will try to convince you that national security is their priority and the financial security of  defense contractors is not but the evidence proves otherwise.

The Pentagon has not passed a financial audit since the Defense Department was created in 1949 and

since 1995 when audits were mandated, at least 8.5 trillion dollars spent by the Pentagon is either missing, wasted or stolen because

according to highly decorated US Marine Corp Major General Smedley Butler, in his book titled "War is a Racket", General Butler describes all wars and conflicts as


 corporate welfare to the warfare complex.



CONTRARY TO WHAT THE PENTAGON AND THE PUPPET POLITICIANS OF THE WARFARE COMPLEX  ARE TRYING TO MAKE YOU BELIEVE,

CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING:


(1) Having a military empire is extremely costly because the warfare complex is always wanting a much bigger share of the economy than is necessary.


 Example:


 In 2011, it only cost millions to initiate peace talks with the Taliban and raid Bin Laden's compound and the co-option of Saddam Hussein during the 80s by President Reagan was comparatively inexpensive and yet


due to the undue political influence of the warfare complex, the so-called war on terror in Afghanistan and Iraq  ended up costing as much as $6 trillion, the equivalent of $75,000 for every American household (calculations done by the prestigious Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government).


Another example:

The Cold War was another unnecessary war in which it would have only cost billions if the leaders in the Soviet Empire were co-opted, similar to the co-option of Stalin during the 40s but

 the Cold War and its aftermath ended up costing hard working American taxpayers $8.75 trillion in present day terms on nuclear weapons programs between 1940 and 1996,  according to an audit done by the Brookings Institution.



(2) While enriching the US warfare complex, why should US tax dollars go towards protecting the world,  so that certain countries ( example: Switzerland ) can have a higher per capita income than the US ?

(3) A military empire can't help but be coercive or threatening by nature and at the same time, the US government should learn from the mistakes of the British empire and the Soviet empire  that  maintaining an empire is extremely costly in terms of blood and treasure and

 those who feel "occupied" by military powers tend to rebel as seen by the British being driven out of North America and

 US government troops leaving Saudi Arabia in 2003 due to the terrorist attacks on 9/11/01.


The  link below shows how the US government can police the world without using the military which will only cost about 50 billion a year instead of

 the lowest estimate of 1.1 trillion dollars a year the US government now spends on maintaining its unsustainable military empire.


(4) US government has in the past co-opted dictators ( example: Stalin in the 40s and Saddam in the 80s ) which enabled the US to do business with Stalin and Saddam plus

 by being non-confrontational, the US government can have peace with all its enemies, similar to the peace that exists between China and North Korea.

 Normalizing relations with the enemy ( example: Iran, North Korea etc ) will result in restoring full trade relations.

 Psychology Professor Steven Pinker of Harvard University agrees with Dr Ron Paul who says that

 friendly trade with the “enemy” will reap beneficial results since
 the “enemy” has a vested interest in your success when you trade with him.


 (5) Whether the US government has a military empire or not, American goods and services will always be  in demand all over the world, similar to  Swiss goods and services being in high demand throughout the  world, even though the Swiss do not have a military empire.


 (6) In fact, the demand for American goods and services will increase due to the fact that when the US government gives up its worldwide military empire, the friendship towards America (from non-allies) would increase dramatically.


 (7) Countries have to pay for their own security which in turn will keep American goods and services competitive since countries cannot subsidize the private enterprise if they have to foot the entire security bill



 (8) By saving hundreds of billions of dollars in giving up the US government's military empire, the US government can in turn concentrate on making sure our infrastructure is the best in the world, resulting in no traffic jams, blackouts, slow internet speeds etc.,


and in having the best infrastructure in the world, American goods and services can use the infrastructure facilities to further reduce the cost of goods and services produced.



 (9) If the world community, local law enforcement and corporations through private security are not able to keep sea lanes free of piracy, its a lot cheaper raising the price of goods and services ( example : due to the cost of insurance or shoplifting ) than spending up to 1400 billion a year on an unnecessary world wide military empire.



 (10) Corporations should realize that the US government cannot bail them out militarily if corporate assets in a particular country are taxed more heavily or nationalized and so

 just as any smart portfolio manager diversifies his portfolio, corporations should not put "all their eggs in one basket" but rather diversify throughout the world, just in case their assets are confiscated in any one country.


FOR A MORE DETAILED DISCUSSION ON :

(1) how to delay the coming bankruptcy or even prevent the bankruptcy ( read Part Seven of this Seven Part Blog )


(2) how to stop people like Hitler (read Part Five of this Seven Part Blog ),


(3) dealing with human rights issues ( read Part Six of this Seven Part Blog ),

(4) terrorism (read Part One of this Seven Part Blog ) and

(5) how to police the world without using the military (read Part Six of this Seven Part Blog )

which will cost only about $50 billion a year plus another $50 billion to defend the homeland for a total national security yearly bill of $100 billion.



PLEASE CONTINUE TO PART ONE OF THE SEVEN PART BLOG:

http://worldpeacethroughworldwidedisarmament.blogspot.com/2013/07/911-attacks-could-have-been-prevented.html